-  Articles   -  How do DeFi Protocols Make Money? Revenue examples with leading projects
How Defi Protocols Make Money

With the number of daily active wallets using applications on Ethereum reaching an all-time high of 1.07 million, decentralised finance (DeFi) protocols have become increasingly popular. This growing popularity has resulted in these protocols generating significant fees, upwards of $1 million USD per day, many question where these fees come from and where they go.

Moreover, the majority of DeFi projects’ tokens are used for governance purposes, enabling holders to vote on improvement proposals. Many criticise these tokens for their limited utility. However, some DeFi protocols are innovative in the token design, directing emissions towards holders staking their tokens or reducing trading fees for holders.

But how do they actually make money for the projects? In this article, Innovation Analyst Nathan Lenga covers how Decentralized Finance (DeFi) protocols generate revenue with examples from leading projects in the ecosystem – from decentralized exchanges (DEX) to lending protocols.

Are DeFi Protocols Companies?

As the masses flock to DeFi platforms that increase access to financial instruments for all investors, some have begun comparing them to companies. This derives from many blue-chip protocols frequently being lionised for their ability to generate revenue. Similar to analysing a company’s cash flows, DeFi’s protocols’ tokenomics must be understood and their unique impact on profitability. Yet, despite this comparison to companies, those valuing DeFi projects often fail to consider whether they are profitable considering incentives and other expenses. 

There are a variety of categories within the DeFi landscape. Some examples include projects generating revenue from facilitating swaps and those which accrue fees by acting as a forum for lending. Regardless of the classification of a DeFi application, the profitability equation remains the same; profitability is defined as revenue generated by fees minus token emissions.

Decentralised Exchanges

A Decentralised Exchange (DEX) is a protocol that offers users a forum to trade one token for another token in a peer-to-peer fashion. To achieve this, most DEXs use automated market makers (AMMs) whereby liquidity providers send their tokens into a liquidity pool. Akin to traditional lenders and banks, providers offer their liquidity in exchange for interest. DEXs generate revenue by taking fees for every transaction. Each trading pool on this protocol could take a different cut, facilitating a competitive environment whereby traders have different options when using DEXs.


With the highest daily volume, Uniswap takes the throne of the most popular DEX. With Uniswap consistently having a trading volume of more than $1 billion USD, the protocol, on average, generates over $1.6 million USD in fees. However, Uniswap is not profitable as all of these fees fall under the category of supply-side revenue. This is because liquidity providers receive all revenue generated from transactional exchanges on Uniswap. Notably, unlike most DeFi protocols, Uniswap does not pay out token emissions. 

Beyond acting as a governance token, Uniswap’s UNI has no other utility. There have nonetheless been ongoing discussions on the Uniswap forums for the protocol to turn on the ‘fee switch’. This would see UNI holders earning minimal amounts of revenue based on the DEX’s trading volume. 

Curve Finance

Curve Finance is another well-adopted DEX that strives for stability and composability. By only offering liquidity pools between similar assets, like stablecoins, Curve offers an efficient method to exchange tokens with low fees and low slippage. As such, Curve has an average trading volume of $100 million USD. Despite boasting 10% of Uniswap’s trading volume, Curve only generates 2.3% of Uniswap’s fees, averaging $37.1k USD per day.

Curve also differs from Uniswap in that liquidity providers receive less revenue from trades. This begs the question: why would individuals deposit their tokens on Curve as opposed to Uniswap? The answer is that Curve utilises a vote escrowed lockup model whereby liquidity providers receive power to direct token emissions towards themselves. As such, Curve’s native token, CRV, pays out token emissions to encourage individuals to provide liquidity. Currently, Curve’s daily issuance of CRV equates to $840.3k USD, rendering the DEX unprofitable.

Decentralised Derivative Exchanges

Decentralised derivative exchanges enable users to trade perpetual futures in a peer-to-peer fashion. These protocols give retail investors access to financial instruments that were previously not available through traditional finance entities. Most decentralised derivative exchanges incentivise individuals to deposit liquidity through fees. Moreover, derivative exchanges require users to provide collateral to trade derivatives without the need for centralised parties.


The DeFi protocol, dYdX, facilitates the buying and selling of perpetual futures. Built on StarkWare, a layer-two scaling network for Ethereum, dYdX allows users to trade derivatives without paying high gas fees or service fees. Accordingly, this platform has grown in popularity with an average of $1.2 billion USD in daily volume. The significant volume conducted on dYdX has resulted in the protocol, on average, generating under $900k USD per month. Furthermore, with about 50% of this revenue being transferred to lenders as incentives, dYdX is profitable. 

Similar to UNI, dYdX’s DYDX serves as a governance token. Therefore, holders of DYDX are able to vote on governance proposals for the protocol. The derivative exchange’s team has provided no clarity on whether DYDX will receive additional utility in the future.

Lending Protocols

Decentralised lending protocols offer individuals a means to take loans out by posting their tokens as collateral. Simultaneously, these platforms enable investors to lock their crypto up, effectively lending it, in return for an interest rate known as an annual percentage yield (APY). Accordingly, many utilise these dApps to borrow tokens for trading to generate more profits whilst retaining their collateral. To maintain the health of the protocol, decentralised lending applications allow other individuals to act as liquidators. As such, if a borrower’s position falls below a predetermined health factor, they risk liquidation whereby their collateral is purchased at a discount.


Maker is the most popular lending protocol. With just under $8.9 billion in total value locked (TVL), Maker currently contributes to 13.2% of Ethereum’s TVL. This platform enables depositors to lend its native stablecoin, DAI, and earn interest as they would with a centralised bank. Maker generates revenue via its stability fee which is the interest charged to borrowers, as well as taking a cut on every liquidation. The lending protocol is averaging over $7 billion USD in daily borrowing volume and millions in weekly liquidations, Maker is, on average, netting more than $50k USD per day.

Moreover, Maker has no token emissions. As a result, all revenue generated by the lending protocol accrues to its decentralised autonomous organisation (DAO), MakerDAO. Unlike most DeFi platforms, Maker pays no fees, ergo its profit margins remain at 100%. However, without token emissions, Maker’s token, MKR, lacks utility, acting as a governance token.


Aave is another dApp in this category dominating Ethereum’s ecosystem with about $5.3 billion USD in TVL. This lending protocol accepts a wider range of collateral, such as USDT, USDC, DAI and more. Aave offers a range of unique features, including flash loans where users can withdraw a large sum of tokens without collateral, yet must pay it back within the same block. Despite having a similar lending and borrowing model to Maker, Aave only accumulates revenue from taking a fee off the interest paid to the lenders. Nevertheless, the DeFi application is presently seeing about $5 billion USD in borrowing volume per day. Although Aave is averaging over $450k USD in total revenue, around $400k USD is supply-side revenue that goes to lenders.

Additionally, Aave issues AAVE tokens to users who stake the token and provide liquidity to certain DEX pools. Aave’s daily issuance of its native token totals $116.3k USD. Accordingly, the protocol incurs a daily loss of about $66.3k USD. Similar to MKR, AAVE’s only utility is governance.


Irrespective of the burgeoning growth in the sector of DeFi, the sustainability of these protocols is uncertain – as expenses eclipse revenue. If dApps are the businesses many compare them to, they would fall into the start-up category. Therefore, like most early-stage businesses, being unprofitable is not a ghastly surprise. However, through the passage of time, DeFi platforms may need to look at integrating more sustainable tokenomics that do not solely rely on token emissions, whilst concurrently driving revenue to tokens. Nonetheless, as DeFi moves further away from traditional finance norms, innovative protocols with nuanced revenue and expense models will undoubtedly be launched.

About Zerocap

Zerocap provides digital asset investment and digital asset custodial services to forward-thinking investors and institutions globally. For frictionless access to digital assets with industry-leading security, contact our team at [email protected] or visit our website

This material is intended for illustrative purposes and general information only. It does not constitute financial advice nor does it take into account your investment objectives, financial situation or particular needs. You should consider the information in light of your objectives, financial situation and needs before making any decision about whether to acquire or dispose of any digital asset. Investments in digital assets can be risky and you may lose your investment. Past performance is no indication of future performance.

Receive Our Insights

Subscribe to the mailing list to receive our industry reports, news and commentary.